Norway fund could trigger wave of large fossil fuel divestments, say experts (2024)

Norway’s decision to dump all coal-focused investments from its $900bn sovereign wealth fund could unleash a wave of divestment from other large funds, according to investment experts. The fund, the largest in the world, is one of the top 10 investors in the global coal industry.

The move, agreed late on Wednesday, is one of the most significant victories to date for a fast-growing and UN-backed fossil-fuel divestment campaign. It will affect $9bn-$10bn (£5.8-£6.5bn) of coal-related investments, according to the Norwegian government.

“Investments in coal companies can have both a climate risk and a future financial risk,” said Svein Flaatten of the governing Conservative party, which made a cross-party agreement to implement the selling of coal investments.

A series of analyses have shown that the world’s existing reserves of fossil fuels are several times greater than can be burned while keeping the temperature below the 2C safety limit agreed by the world’s governments. Furthermore, authorities such as the World Bank and Bank of England have warned that fossil fuel reserves will be left worthless if the action needed to cut carbon emissions kicks in.

How to divest your personal finance – your questions answeredRead more

“The significance of the Norway decision is that, because of their size and reach, this will act as a major signal for other investors to follow. This will certainly create a wave,” said Mark Campanale, founder of the Carbon Tracker Initiative, which has pioneered analysis of the financial risks of fossil fuels.

“Coupled with the news from AXA that it was exiting €500m (£355m) of coal and investing €3bn in renewables, this is a grim week for the listed coal majors,” Campanale said.

Tom Sanzillo, a former comptroller of New York State who oversaw a $156bn pension fund, also said Norway’s move was likely to spark others to do the same: “Coal stocks are losing money every day. No investment policy that I am familiar with can keep holding stocks in an industry with catastrophic losses and with no realistic case for an upside. Norway has led, and I suspect they will not be alone for long.”

Sanzillo, now director of finance at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, said: “Coal markets globally are in the midst of a wrenching structural decline. The coal industry has failed to compete with other energy resources, particularly wind, solar and energy efficiency.”

Heffa Schücking, at German NGO Urgewald and who has written several financial reports on Norway’s wealth fund, said: “This will send a strong signal to investors all over the world. Coal is yesterday’s fuel.”

Campaign sign up

The new investment policy was approved unanimously by Norway’s finance committee and will be formally adopted by parliament on 5 June.

It requires the fund, founded on Norway’s vast oil wealth, to exclude companies earning more than 30% of their revenues from coal or producing more than 30% of their electricity from coal. The fund withdrew from 32 coal companies in 2014 for environmental reasons, but recently faced criticism that its overall holdings in the industry had actually risen.

Norway’s wealth fund owns 1.3% of the entire world’s traded stocks and the new policy is likely to see it shed investments in companies all over the world, including Germany’s RWE, China’s Shenhua, Duke Energy in the US, AGL Energy in Australia, Reliance Power in India and Japan’s Electric Power Development Corporation.

“We expect that billions of euros will be withdrawn from the coal industry,” says Truls Gulowsen from Greenpeace. “This is a huge win for the divestment movement and a real sign of hope that investment patterns can be changed.”

Bill McKibben, co-founder of 350.org, the organisation leading the global fossil fuel divestment campaign, said: “If you’d told any of us, three years ago, that the planet’s largest sovereign wealth fund would begin divesting, we would have laughed. There’s much work to be done taking on coal, oil, and gas but the momentum is definitely on our side.”

Organisations that have cut or curbed coal investments recently include insurance giant Axa, the Church of England and Oxford University. The Guardian, which is running a campaign asking the world’s biggest health charities to divest, is owned by the Guardian Media Group, which announced it would divest its £800m fund from all fossil fuels in April.

Norway fund could trigger wave of large fossil fuel divestments, say experts (2024)

FAQs

Who is the biggest investor in fossil fuels? ›

At the top of that list is JPMorgan Chase, the largest funder of fossil fuels cumulatively since the Paris Agreement on climate change was signed in 2016, according to the report. Citi, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America are also among the top five fossil financiers since 2016, the report found.

What are the effects of the fossil fuel divestment campaign on stock returns? ›

We conclude that divesting from fossil fuels does not have a statistically significant impact on overall portfolio performance, and only a very marginal impact on the utility derived from such portfolios.

Who controls most of the fossil fuels? ›

The world's proven fossil fuel reserves are controlled by state-owned enterprises (such as Saudi Aramco), privately held companies or companies listed on the world's stock exchanges (like ExxonMobil, BHP and Peabody Energy).

Who owns the fossil fuels? ›

It is noted that the majority of proven reserves of thermal coal, oil and gas (as taken from 2018 BP energy data and based on 'geological and engineering data') are controlled by non-public entities, such as Saudi Aramco and governments directly.

Why is divestment from fossil fuels bad? ›

There's one major problem with divestment: Selling an asset requires someone to buy it. In other words, for you to divest, someone else needs to invest. As a result, divestment could end up breathing new life into fossil fuel assets – exactly the opposite of what's intended.

What would happen if we get rid of fossil fuel subsidies? ›

We estimate that scrapping explicit and implicit fossil-fuel subsidies would prevent 1.6 million premature deaths annually, raise government revenues by $4.4 trillion, and put emissions on track toward reaching global warming targets.

What is the biggest contributor to fossil fuels? ›

Emissions from natural gas consumption represent 78% of the direct fossil fuel CO2 emissions from the residential and commercial sector in 2022. Coal consumption is a minor component of energy use in both of these sectors.

Is JP Morgan the biggest investor in fossil fuels? ›

JPMorgan Chase is the top funder of fossil fuels in the world, being the largest supporter of fossil fuel expansion, and even the top funder of oil and gas extraction in the Amazon biome.

Who are the shareholders of fossil fuels? ›

Nearly half the emissions potential from largest oil, gas and coal firms 'under the influence of 10 financial entities', including Fidelity, BlackRock and State Street.

Who is the leader in fossil fuels? ›

As the biggest oil and gas producer in the world, the U.S. must lead the charge in this rapid shift if the world is going to avert a climate catastrophe.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Maia Crooks Jr

Last Updated:

Views: 6331

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (63 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Maia Crooks Jr

Birthday: 1997-09-21

Address: 93119 Joseph Street, Peggyfurt, NC 11582

Phone: +2983088926881

Job: Principal Design Liaison

Hobby: Web surfing, Skiing, role-playing games, Sketching, Polo, Sewing, Genealogy

Introduction: My name is Maia Crooks Jr, I am a homely, joyous, shiny, successful, hilarious, thoughtful, joyous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.