Why are disruptive selections called?
Disruptive selection, which also goes by the name diversifying selection, refers to a form of natural selection occurring in a population where extreme traits are favored over intermediate traits.
Disruptive selection occurs when both extreme traits are favored in an environment. Disruptive selection increases genetic and phenotypic diversity in a population, since more than one phenotype, or physical trait, is favored. As a result, disruptive selection is sometimes called diversifying selection.
Disruptive selection can lead to a bimodal distribution of trait values and therefore can result in an increase in the variance of a trait without a change in its mean.
Disruptive selection in which selection favours individuals with the smallest and largest values of the trait. These individuals have the highest fitness and individuals with intermediate values are at a fitness disadvantage.
Disruptive selection can be common in natural populations. Intraspecific competition for resources may be a key driver of such selection.
adjective. dis·rup·tive dis-ˈrəp-tiv. : disrupting or tending to disrupt some process, activity, condition, etc. : causing or tending to cause disruption.
The car and the television can be named as two famous disruptive technologies in history. The car changed completely the way we go from one place to another, while TV changed the way we entertain ourselves.
Disruptive selection is often assumed to be relatively rare, because it is dynamically unstable and hence should be transient. However, frequency-dependent interactions such as intraspecific competition may stabilize fitness minima and make disruptive selection more common.
Disruptive selection dramatically increased phenotypic variation in the two shape characters, but left phenotypic variation in wing size unaltered. Fluctuating and stabilizing selection consistently decreased phenotypic variation in all traits.
Once the selected allele reaches fixation, that locus becomes monomorphic and genetic variation is lost. The type of selection most likely to increase variation is disruptive (or diversifying) selection, which occurs when two or more pheno-types are fitter than the intermediate phenotypes that lie between them.
Why do disruptive selection pressures tend to?
d. Why do disruptive selection pressures tend to favor rapid evolutionary changes? a. They result in sudden gene frequency changes.
A third category of selection (although not as frequently mentioned) is known as 'disruptive selection', which is essentially the direct opposite of balancing selection. In this case, both extremes of allele frequencies are favoured (e.g. 1 for one allele or 1 for the other) but intermediate frequencies are not.

Diversifying (or disruptive) selection: Diversifying selection occurs when extreme values for a trait are favored over the intermediate values. This type of selection often drives speciation. Diversifying selection can also occur when environmental changes favor individuals on either end of the phenotypic spectrum.
It is the selection against the mean of a population distribution, causing disruptive selection and divergent genotypes. This example is from Wikipedia and may be reused under a CC BY-SA license. Stabilizing selection is the opposite of disruptive selection.
Key Takeaways. Disruptive innovation is a radical change in an existing industry or market by any entity offering unique or untapped alternatives. Disruption benefits the disruptors, existing businesses that “ride the wave,” and most importantly, consumers as better options become available for improving their lives.
Children with disruptive behavior disorders show ongoing patterns of uncooperative and defiant behavior. Their responses to authority figures range from indifference to hostility. Their behavior frequently impacts those around them, including teachers, peers, and family members.
- They are fearless in pursuing the truth. ...
- They are decisive and inspire confidence. ...
- They are adaptable. ...
- They are often life-long learners. ...
- They understand that disruption can cause uncertainty for team members. ...
- They are customer-obsessed and product-obsessed.
- Offense (innovation): Pushing others out of the way. ...
- Defense (competition): Counteracting the disruption in response to a missed opportunity. ...
- Serendipity (chance): Discovering things you didn't know would be of value to you.
The main difference between directional and disruptive selection is that directional selection favors a phenotype most fitted to the environment whereas disruptive selection favors extreme values for a trait over intermediate values.
2:Disruptive Selection occurs when selection favors the extreme trait values over the intermediate trait values. In this case the variance increases as the population is divided into two distinct groups. Disruptive selection plays an important role in speciation.
What is disruptive selection in ecology?
Disruptive selection occurs when extreme phenotypes have a fitness advantage over more intermediate phenotypes. The phenomenon is particularly interesting when selection keeps a population in a disruptive regime.
A more classic example of disruptive selection is the beak size of finches on the Galapagos Islands that was studied by Darwin. Because the majority of seeds found on some of the islands were either large or small, finches with large and small beaks (no medium-sized beaks) were favored on those islands.
An example of disruptive selection: in many populations of animals that have multiple male mating strategies, such as lobster, large, dominant alpha males obtain mates by brute force, while small males can sneak in for furtive copulations with the females in an alpha male's territory.
Disruptive selection is natural selection that maintains high frequencies of two different sets of alleles. In other words, individuals with intermediate phenotypes or alleles are selected against.
A third category of selection (although not as frequently mentioned) is known as 'disruptive selection', which is essentially the direct opposite of balancing selection. In this case, both extremes of allele frequencies are favoured (e.g. 1 for one allele or 1 for the other) but intermediate frequencies are not.