Why German Soldiers Don’t Have to Obey Orders | HISTORY (2024)

Consider, if you will, a fraught military standoff. A soldier from the German army receives an order from a superior to fire his gun, but he puts it down and walks away. In the United States, he would have just committed the unforgivable and illegal act of insubordination, even if the superior officer weren’t from the same service branch.

But in this scenario, the German soldier didn’t break the rules—he followed them. Military disobedience is actually baked into the German Bundeswehr, or armed forces. And the reasons why can be found in the country’s sinister past.

American military law states that an order can only be disobeyed if it is unlawful. However, the German military manual states that a military order is not binding if it is not “of any use for service,” or cannot reasonably be executed. In fact, if the order denies human dignity to the armed forces member or the order’s target, it must not be obeyed.

In practice, that means that a soldier or armed forces administrator can ignore a superior officer’s order—even if it’s in the midst of combat or is given by a high-ranking official.

That’s not how it used to be. Unconditional obedience to military orders was once a norm going back to the kingdoms that preceded Germany before it became a nation state in 1871. During World War I, Germany executed 48 soldiers for insubordination, and its basic training regimen—designed around unconditional submission to higher officers—was known as one of Europe’s most brutal.

READ MORE: Life in the Trenches of World War I

After World War I, this discipline softened thanks to the Allied forces, which blamed the country’s strict military hierarchy for the ruthlessness of World War I. Under the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was forced to admit guilt for the war and to restrict its military’s numbers and weapons. The country’s military was effectively dismantled, with officer schools shut down and the number of troops reduced to just 100,000.

Why German Soldiers Don’t Have to Obey Orders | HISTORY (1)Why German Soldiers Don’t Have to Obey Orders | HISTORY (2)

However, Germany had no intention of following the treaty’s military provisions. Soon after the treaty was signed, German general Hans von Seeckt began to reorganize and secretly rebuild the military with the help of Russia. German companies began producing forbidden arms on Russian soil and German troops trained with Russian soldiers—all in secret.

By the time Adolf Hitler came into power in 1933 with promises to revive the country’s former might, the German public was ready for it. Hitler immediately began to openly flout the treaty. As he brought Germany’s secretive postwar military into the open, they began pledging their loyalty directly to him. From 1934 on, the German military oath was sworn to Hitler himself—and it contained a clause that promised “unconditional obedience.”

That rule was taken seriously during the lead up to World War II and the conflict itself. At least 15,000 German soldiers were executed for desertion alone, and up to 50,000 were killed for often minor acts of insubordination. An unknown number were summarily executed, often in the moment, by their officers or comrades when they refused to follow commands.

This wasn’t always the case. Historian David H. Kitterman’s research on a group of 135 German soldiers who refused orders to kill Jews, POWs or hostages shows they suffered beatings and death threats for defying their superiors, but none were executed. Although insubordination was taken seriously, excuses that soldiers had “just been obeying orders” when they participated in Holocaust atrocities weren’t entirely true.

Why German Soldiers Don’t Have to Obey Orders | HISTORY (3)Why German Soldiers Don’t Have to Obey Orders | HISTORY (4)

When the war ended, the Allies assumed control of Germany and decommissioned its entire military. It took a decade for Germany—now split in two—to regain a military, and in 1955 a new Bundeswehr was created.

The new German armed forces were a different beast than their predecessors. German law forbids the use of its military to do anything other than defend Germany itself, though the military does participate in some humanitarian and NATO coalition missions. Instead of blind obedience, the military emphasizes Innere Führung, a hard-to-translate concept that centers the military experience around the inner conscience of each individual.

As a result, many German soldiers refuse combat assignments or disobey orders—with no consequence. Their ability to do so has been repeatedly held up in civil courts (Germany has no military courts) and in the federal government. In 2007, the German federal government even went so far as to state that German law means unconditional authority or loyalty to superiors can’t exist. Soldiers must not obey unconditionally, the government wrote, but carry out “an obedience which is thinking.” However, the policy statement added, soldiers can’t disobey an order merely because their personal views conflict with those of their superior.

Nowhere is that conception of conscientious military service more apparent than at the Benderblock, a Berlin building whereparticipants of a failed attempt to assassinate Hitler were executed in 1944. Today, the building is a museum to German resistance—and every year, it’s the place where new German soldiers are traditionally sworn to their duties.

It’s intentional that their oaths to defend Germany are sworn in a place not of military obedience, but of military resistance. The brutal legacy of two world wars and the Holocaust explains Germany’s reticence to make its soldiers obey orders no matter what.

This story is part ofHeroes Week, a weeklong celebration of our heroes in the armed forces. Read more veterans stories here.

Why German Soldiers Don’t Have to Obey Orders | HISTORY (2024)

FAQs

Why don't German soldiers have to obey orders? ›

Instead of blind obedience, the military emphasizes Innere Führung, a hard-to-translate concept that centers the military experience around the inner conscience of each individual. As a result, many German soldiers refuse combat assignments or disobey orders—with no consequence.

Why must soldiers follow orders without question? ›

The three main reasons why it is important for a soldier to follow the orders they are given is to be combat effective, disciplined, and to just be a good soldier.

What happens if a soldier refuses to follow orders? ›

Violating a general order or regulation: This encompasses disobeying any regulation or order provided by the Department of Defense or an individual service. Punishments can range from a simple reprimand or forfeiture of pay and allowances to confinement for up to two years and a dishonorable discharge.

What is it called when a soldier does not follow orders? ›

Insubordination is when a service member willfully disobeys the lawful orders of a superior officer.

Should soldiers always obey orders? ›

That behavior falls instead under Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which clearly prohibits failure to obey a lawful order or regulation. Insubordination is not mission command, it is a crime.

Are soldiers allowed to disobey orders? ›

Only lawful orders have to be followed. This is what the Manual for Courts-Martial says about the lawfulness of orders: (i) Inference of lawfulness. An order requiring the performance of a military duty or act may be inferred to be lawful, and it is disobeyed at the subordinate's peril.

Why do soldiers blindly follow orders? ›

Military personnel are often thought to have a duty to obey all legitimate orders from their superiors – not just because they might be punished for disobedience, but because their superiors have the right to their obedience.

Why is it important for soldiers to obey orders? ›

Military discipline generates power through concerted action by submission to authority. Soldiers are restrained by their oaths, regulations, law, ethics rules, policies, rules of engagement, and general and specific orders. The chain of command has the authority to issue and duty to obey lawful orders.

When should a soldier disobey an order? ›

Manifestly unlawful orders

This practice, together with the fact that a subordinate who commits a war crime pursuant to an order which is manifestly unlawful cannot invoke that order as a defence and remains guilty of that crime (see Rule 155), means that there is a duty to disobey such an order.

Can you say no in the military? ›

It's OK to say you don't have the time required for that commitment but would love to help out in another way. It's OK to say "no."

What is an illegal order in the military? ›

An order that is “arbitrary and capricious, overly broad in scope, or to impose an unjust limitation on a personal right” is not lawful.

What's it called when a soldier refuses to fight? ›

Conscientious objection to military service refers to the position taken by individuals who oppose participation in war on the basis of their religious, moral, or ethical beliefs.

What was a soldier called if they left the military without permission? ›

Desertion is the abandonment of a military duty or post without permission (a pass, liberty or leave) and is done with the intention of not returning. This contrasts with unauthorized absence (UA) or absence without leave (AWOL /ˈeɪwɒl/), which are temporary forms of absence.

What is the military order 92? ›

Following the start of Israel's belligerent occupation in 1967, it placed all Palestinian water usage and development under its military control. Military Order No. 92 (August 1967) transferred authority over all water resources in the occupied territory to the Israeli military, while Military Order No.

What is it called when you abandon your post in the military? ›

Article 85 of the UCMJ covers desertion with intent to permanently leave the armed forces, shirk critical service, or avoid high-risk duty. Desertion also applies to anyone who tenders their resignation and quits their post or proper duties before receiving notice of its acceptance.

Are German soldiers allowed to disobey orders? ›

Yes. It's a legacy of WWII. German soldiers (Bundeswehr) are not only allowed, but obligated, to disobey any order they think would violate human dignity. This point is so heavily emphasized in basic training that a lot of new recruits are sworn into the Service at the castle where Hitler was nearly assassinated.

Why is Germany's army restricted? ›

The French sought to limit Germany's potential to regain its economic superiority and also to rearm. The German army was to be limited to 100,000 men. Conscription was forbidden. The treaty restricted the Navy to vessels under 10,000 tons, with a ban on the acquisition or maintenance of a submarine fleet.

What would happen to soldiers who disobeyed orders in ww1? ›

For more extreme cases of ill-discipline, more serious punishments were carried out. If a man was found guilty of desertion or cowardice, for example, he could be sentenced to death. In total, 346 men under British command were executed during the war.

What are the German army restrictions? ›

German military and navy structures restrictions outlined in the Treaty of Versailles. Following the ratification of the Treaty of Versailles, firm restrictions were placed on the German military, most notably, the entire army was restricted to just 100,000 men, while the navy was reduced to just 15,000 men.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Moshe Kshlerin

Last Updated:

Views: 5623

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (77 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Moshe Kshlerin

Birthday: 1994-01-25

Address: Suite 609 315 Lupita Unions, Ronnieburgh, MI 62697

Phone: +2424755286529

Job: District Education Designer

Hobby: Yoga, Gunsmithing, Singing, 3D printing, Nordic skating, Soapmaking, Juggling

Introduction: My name is Moshe Kshlerin, I am a gleaming, attractive, outstanding, pleasant, delightful, outstanding, famous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.