The Emperor's Retreat · Narratives of World War II in the Pacific · Bell Library Exhibits (2024)

The Emperor's Retreat

William Quin

The Unresolved War: “The Emperor’s Retreat”

Japan’s culture, during WWII, was not one which praised surrender. Soldiers, upon deployment, were expected to either return home victorious or die in battle. Bushido ethics remained prevalent within the country and the samurai mentality experienced a resurgence. “Some Japanese soldiers considered surrender a way of courting death, therefore contrary to the Bushido code.”[1] These societal norms, paired with the righteousness of a sacrificing one’s life for the Emperor, led to unfathomable levels of commitment to victory. The Japanese fought and lost the battles of Midway, Okinawa and Marianas. They were forced out of New Guinea and continued to lose territory in Southeast Asia. Incessant fire-bombing resulted in the destruction of Tokyo and many other Japanese cities. With the defeat of Germany ,Tri-Partite ally to Japan, the chances of preventing a mainland invasion by the American military were rapidly decreasing.

Japan was dedicated to retaining their dominance of the region and gaining international respect for the Japanese Empire. Rather than attempting to concede their position and broker a surrender, Japan began to “dig in” and prepare plans to retreat to defendable and secure locations around the country. One of these locations, which was designed to house the Emperor and Japanese military officials, is located in Matsushiro. “These underground shelters, unprecedented in their gigantic size, were prepared in expectation of an impending U.S. landing the main islands of Japan.”[2] These tunnels were constructed by utilizing forced laborers from Korea.

Wartime conditions and subsequent Japanese occupation wreaked havoc on Korea. Japan confiscated and utilized much of the Korean national resources during this time. This resulted in a failed economy and famine like conditions for many Koreans. Many of these Korean citizens either fled to Japan on their own accord or were forcibly taken there in order to work. Upon arrival, these Koreans typically learned that they would indeed work but without pay. Around 7,000 of these Korean Laborers were forced to construct an intricate labyrinth of tunnels, many large enough to drive a military vehicle through. These tunnels were built to house the Japanese officials and Emperor in the event of an American invasion. The effort put into this stronghold insinuates that the Japanese were not planning on negotiating a surrender.

To determine the hypothetical success or failure of this plan to defend against military defeat, one must determine whether or not they would have been able to defeat an American invasion and prevent further military intervention from Allied forces. I believe that this plan would never have succeeded. Prior to the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Russia declared war on Japan. The combination of a Russian invasion in the northwest and an American invasion in the southeast would have absolutely crippled the supply lines of the Japanese military and crushed their defensive forces. It would not have been a swift victory and many lives would have been lost on all sides. When one takes into account the effect that the atomic bombs had on the resolve of the Japanese. “In the book Hiroshima, by John Hersey, he writes that nearly 200,000 out of the 250,000 residents of Hiroshima were either killed or injured. It is reasonable to assume that continued use of these bombs would have pounded the Japanese forces into submission and forced the Emperor to concede.

The Japanese surrender, after Nagasaki and Hiroshima and were bombed, has resulted in an unresolved war; a war fought by Japanese soldiers and civilians in both public and private spheres. The betrayal of the Bushido Complex, the failure of Japan to establish a great empire and assert its equality amongst western nations, and the massive lack of execution in successfully making the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere operational, all perpetuate this war. How could this situation have played out differently? Would Japan have retained its unwillingness to surrender had the U.S. not developed atomic bombs? Is the Emperor to blame, or were the military officials responsible? Another aspect of the unresolved war is the fact that the citizens of Matsushiro live with a visual reminder, literally carved into the mountains, of the atrocities that occurred during this era. “All wars are fought twice, the first time on the battlefield, the second time in Memory.”[3]

Many historians debate over the sovereignty of Emperor Hirohito’s command during WWII. The Japanese military was often steadfast in its commitment to victory at any cost. The Bushido Complex was intricately woven and heavy indoctrination of nationalistic views had created a Japanese military which was almost incapable of imaging defeat. This caused prior negotiations such as those around The Potsdam Declaration to reach inevitable stalemates. “Even then, he refused to confront the army until Hiroshima and, at least as crucially, Soviet entry into the war closed off all hope of a negotiated surrender (via Moscow's good offices) with the Americans. With these two cataclysms, the best chance to preserve the imperial institution had become a divorce from the army and an appeal to Washington based on claims that the emperor had been informed of but not involved in the policy process, and would be useful in keeping army fanaticism.”[4] I believe that the Japanese Empire succeeded in creating such a strong nationalistic military complex that they were incapable of reigning it in upon realizations of defeat. This, combined with constant embellishments of Japanese officials’ battlefield updates diluted the reality of Japan’s defeat. I assert that Emperor Hirohito was primarily focused on retaining his position and saving face for the Japanese Empire. His military wanted victory or death, he wanted Victory or respect and recognition. This disconnect led to the Japanese surrendering the way they did and served to perpetuate the unresolved wars faced by East-Asian countries today.

[1] Dixon, Boyd, Laura Gilda, and Lon Bulgrin. "The Archaeology of World War II Japanese Stragglers on the Island of Guam and the Bushido Code." Asian Perspectives 51, no. 1 (2012): 110-27. Accessed November 10, 2018. doi:10.1353/asi.2012.0000.

[2] Cook, Haruko Taya., and Theodore F. Cook. Shizue, Fujii. “The Emperor’s Retreat”. Japan at War: An Oral History. 433. New York: New York Press, 1992.

[3] Nguyen, Viet Thanh. Nothing Ever Dies: Vietnam and the Memory of War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.

[4]Barnhart, Michael A., The International History Review, “Hirohito and His Army”. Vol. 21, No. 3 (Sep., 1999), pp. 696-70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40109082

Cross-section of military tunnels in Masushiro, Japan

Oral History Summary

Section 22 of Part 6 in, The Unresolved War, by Yamane Masako explores and discusses the enslavement of 7,000 Korean emigrants for the purpose pf constructing and infrastructure to accommodate “the Emperor’s retreat”. Yamane brings light to the construction process of these subterranean tunnels located in Matsushiro, a small town near Nagano, Japan. Ground was broken on the tunnel project in November of 1944 and did not cease until late August of 1945, after the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This elaborate system of tunnels was put into place, “… planning to move the imperial Japanese headquarters and the government ministries to this location as the position for the final battle.” Masako searches to discover why the Koreans were enslaved and uncover the Japanese Military’s plan for retreat in the event of an American invasion. Would their retreat have been successful?

The Emperor's Retreat · Narratives of World War II in the Pacific · Bell Library Exhibits (2024)

FAQs

Why did Japanese soldiers never surrender? ›

Japan's culture, during WWII, was not one which praised surrender. Soldiers, upon deployment, were expected to either return home victorious or die in battle. Bushido ethics remained prevalent within the country and the samurai mentality experienced a resurgence.

What is the meaning of the Pacific Theatre in the context of World War II? ›

Pacific War, major theatre of World War II that covered a large portion of the Pacific Ocean, East Asia, and Southeast Asia, with significant engagements occurring as far south as northern Australia and as far north as the Aleutian Islands.

What was the most important turning point of World War II in the Pacific theater? ›

Though the June 1942 Battle of Midway is often seen as the turning point of the war in the Pacific, the Solomon Islands campaign, including the Battle of Guadalcanal, was equally pivotal.

What does it reveal about World War II in the Pacific? ›

What does it reveal about World War II in the Pacific? All major battles took place on islands in the Pacific Ocean and Japan. Because of the need for high production rates with minimal interruptions, involvement in the Second World War restrained the growth of labor unions in the American economy.

What were the main causes of World War II in the Pacific? ›

The underlying causes of the outbreak of the war in the Pacific relate to Japan's desire to effectively compete with the industrialized nations of western Europe and the United States.

Who was the guy who didn't know WWII ended? ›

Hiroo Onoda (middle): The Imperial Japanese soldier who hid in the Philippine jungle for 30 years after WWII. March 11, 1974 (photo), Imgur.

Who was the last person to surrender in WWII? ›

And so, after twenty-nine years diligently fighting the Second World War primarily against the farmers of Lubang Island, Hiroo Onoda finally surrendered. He handed over his Arisaka Type 99 bolt-action rifle, five hundred rounds of ammunition, his knife and his grenades.

When was the last Japanese soldier found? ›

Many holdouts were discovered in the jungles of Southeast Asia and the Pacific over the following decades, with the last verified holdout, Private Teruo Nakamura, surrendering on the island of Morotai in 1974.

What was the deadliest theater in WWII? ›

In that bloody struggle, American and Philippine forces tried to hold fast against the Japanese invasion of the Philippines — and failed. More than 30 million soldiers and civilians were killed in the Pacific theater during the course of the war, compared with the 15 million to 20 million killed in Europe.

Why was the Pacific Theater so brutal? ›

Many Japanese soldiers refused to be taken prisoner or to take prisoners themselves. Such tactics, coupled with American racial prejudice, turned the Pacific Theater into a more brutal and barbarous conflict than the European Theater. Japanese defenders fought tenaciously.

How many marines died in the Pacific in WWII? ›

The total dead or missing were 41,592 for all U.S. Army ground troops in the Pacific and southeast Asia, with another 145,706 wounded. The Marine Corps and attached Navy corpsmen suffered total casualties of 23,160 killed or missing and 67,199 wounded.

How were Japanese treated during WWII? ›

Following the Pearl Harbor attack, however, a wave of antiJapanese suspicion and fear led the Roosevelt administration to adopt a drastic policy toward these residents, alien and citizen alike. Virtually all Japanese Americans were forced to leave their homes and property and live in camps for most of the war.

What two nations emerged as the strongest after WWII? ›

As World War II transformed both the United States and the USSR, turning the nations into formidable world powers, competition between the two increased. Following the defeat of the Axis powers, an ideological and political rivalry between the United States and the USSR gave way to the start of the Cold War.

What country started World War II? ›

World War II began in Europe on September 1, 1939, when Germany invaded Poland. Great Britain and France responded by declaring war on Germany on September 3. The war between the U.S.S.R. and Germany began on June 22, 1941, with Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union.

What was the key event of the war in the Pacific? ›

In December 1941 Japan attacked the United States at Pearl Harbor, Hawai'i, causing the U.S. to enter World War II. Over two years would pass until the Allies reached their great turning point in the Pacific War: the defeat of the Japanese at Guadalcanal in February 1943.

What were the two main theaters of ww2? ›

A conflict's theatre is the geographic place where military events occur. World War II had two primary theatres: The European Theatre and the Pacific Theatre.

What happened in the South Pacific during WWII? ›

In the south-west Pacific, General MacArthur advanced towards the Philippines. The main attack was in the central Pacific, where Admiral Nimitz fought an island-hopping campaign with his carrier battle-groups. The capture of islands such as Tarawa, Saipan and Iwo Jima saw heavy casualties on both sides.

What event in the Pacific theater turned the tide of the war? ›

In June 1942, US and Japanese naval forces engaged in a five-day battle in the middle of the Pacific Ocean that changed the course of the war in the Pacific. Top Image: Last minutes on damaged USS Yorktown (CV-5).

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Sen. Emmett Berge

Last Updated:

Views: 5842

Rating: 5 / 5 (60 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Sen. Emmett Berge

Birthday: 1993-06-17

Address: 787 Elvis Divide, Port Brice, OH 24507-6802

Phone: +9779049645255

Job: Senior Healthcare Specialist

Hobby: Cycling, Model building, Kitesurfing, Origami, Lapidary, Dance, Basketball

Introduction: My name is Sen. Emmett Berge, I am a funny, vast, charming, courageous, enthusiastic, jolly, famous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.