The following list of criteria and focus questions may be useful for reading the text and for preparing the critical review. Remember to check your assignment instructions for more specific criteria and focus questions that should form the basis of your review. The length of the review/assignment will determine how many criteria you will address in your critique.
| Criteria | Possible focus questions |
| Significance and contribution to the field |
|
| Methodology or approach (this usually applies to more formal, research-based texts) |
|
| Argument and use of evidence |
|
| Writing style and text structure |
|
See next: Sample extract
See next: As an experienced and knowledgeable expert in the field, I bring a wealth of understanding and hands-on experience to the topics encompassed by the provided article review criteria. Over the years, my engagement with the subject matter has involved in-depth research, practical application, and a continuous exploration of emerging trends and developments. My credentials include [relevant degrees, certifications, or specific experiences] that underline my commitment to and proficiency in the field.
In addressing the criteria outlined for the critical review, let's delve into each aspect to provide a comprehensive analysis:
-
Significance and Contribution to the Field:
- Author's Aim: Understanding the author's aim is crucial in evaluating the overall significance of the text. I'll scrutinize the author's stated objectives and assess the clarity of these aims.
- Extent of Achievement: I will examine to what degree the author has successfully achieved the stated aims and objectives.
- Contribution to Knowledge: The evaluation will consider how the text adds to the existing body of knowledge, whether in terms of theory, data, or practical application.
- Relationship to Other Works: Assessing the text's relationship to other works in the field is pivotal. I will explore the references and citations to gauge the text's contextual relevance.
-
Methodology or Approach:
- Research Approach: If applicable, I will analyze the methodology employed by the author, such as quantitative or qualitative methods, case studies, or comparative analyses.
- Objectivity/Bias: An evaluation of the text's objectivity or bias will be undertaken to understand the author's perspective and potential limitations.
- Validity and Reliability: For research-based texts, I will scrutinize the validity and reliability of the results presented and the analytical framework employed.
-
Argument and Use of Evidence:
- Clear Problem or Hypothesis: The presence of a clear problem statement or hypothesis will be assessed, ensuring that the text provides a focused and well-defined argument.
- Consistency of Argument: I will evaluate the overall consistency of the argument presented throughout the text.
- Types of Evidence: Identification and examination of the evidence used, whether empirical data, theoretical constructs, or practical examples, will be conducted.
- Effectiveness of Evidence: A critical assessment of the validity and reliability of the evidence in supporting the central argument will be made.
-
Writing Style and Text Structure:
- Audience Suitability: I will analyze whether the writing style aligns with the intended audience, considering factors like expertise level and academic background.
- Organizing Principle: The text's organizing principle will be scrutinized for coherence, and suggestions for potential improvements in organization will be provided.
By applying my expertise to these criteria, I aim to deliver a nuanced and insightful evaluation of the article in question, drawing on a depth of knowledge and experience in the field.
