Strategic planning can take any organization to its pinnacle. Thus, companies need to consider various strategies to remain successful and keep their plus side against their competitors and continue to have a positive impact on revenue and profits. Strategies can range from competitive pricing to hiring skilled teams to reduce cost and all of them can be focused on one and only one goal “success and long-run stability” of the company. But today we will talk about “Cost-saving strategies”. The companies seeking cost advantage will have to focus on “an effective cost leadership strategy”.
What is Cost leadership?
Cost Leadership is a strategy to reduce the cost of operation and produce the lowest priced products or services, to outdo the closest competitors and gain market share.
It requires the vigorous pursuit of cost minimization techniques such as efficient utilization of scale of production, good purchasing strategy, modern technology, and producing quality products.
Companies can develop a cost leadership strategy by analyzing existing operations, researching their competitors, identifying strategies to reduce costs, and keeping a track of progress.
Examples:
a.Home Renovation
Many renovation companies have made a mark in the home renovation market by opting to specialize in one aspect of home renovation instead of operating as full-service contractors.
Full-service contractors cost a lot of money and are burdened with additional overheads such as insurance and licensing components.
Specializing in certain aspects such as kitchen, bathroom, garages, and roofing helps them work with wholesale distributors to achieve the best pricing on the standard package they sell to the clients.
They also offer fewer options on customization, which further helps them purchase similar raw materials for their work at a discount.
Are you a small business or startup owner? Learn how much you can save with a
b. Realtor Services
Realtors are legally allowed to charge up to six percent in commissions on a transaction and this amount is generally split between agents.
This means a transaction for $300,000 could the seller almost $18,000 in commissions.
This has led flat fee brokers to enter the realty market and use the cost leadership strategy to advertise fixed commissions on every sale.
As a result, customers attracted by the idea of pocketing most of the sale amount and the included services offered by these brokers such as listing and other necessary legal disclosures have opted to move their business with them.
Difference Between Cost Leadership and Price Leadership
So often, people use the terms price leadership and cost leadership interchangeably, but these two are entirely different concepts.
Cost leadership focuses on establishing a competitive advantage by lowering the cost of operation in the industry. While price leadership means having the lowest price.
A cost leader can also be a price leader in its industry. But it’s important to note that a price leader prioritizes market share by selling its products or services at the lowest prices many times leading to falling in its profitability.
While cost leaders focus on a system that tries to increase efficiency and reduce production costs below the industry average which can allow the company to have balanced growth. These would be considered cost leaders but not price leaders.
What are the benefits of employing a cost leadership strategy?
By employing a cost leadership strategy, a company will not only be able to gain profit but eventually increase its market size as some consumers shop only at stores that offer the lowest price.
Companies with the lowest cost of operation have higher chances of survival during downtimes.
As their survival period is lengthenedand overall stability is assured due to balanced growth might lead to reduced competition.
Companies operating with a cost leadership strategy can achieve higher profit margins by reducing production costs as compared to their competitors who are focusing on pricing strategies.
Surplus capital can be utilized to fund growth or investments such as research, technology upgrades, and other business expansion
How does it work?
Let us take the example of the airline industry and try to understand this concept. The airline industry is a highly competitive market and some companies have adopted the cost leadership strategy to dominate the market and achieve a better position among its rival.
1. Southwest from the U.S.A. is credited as the originator of the low-cost airlines business model, but the phenomenon spread worldwide in the 1990s.
2. In the airline business, the market is often segmented by trip duration and by trip purpose.
3. The Airline that has business travelers as their primary target segment is known as full-service carriers while the low-cost carriers are focused on leisure travelers.
4. There are differences between the business models of these two carriers
5. The low-cost carriers have adopted many modifications to gain a competitive advantage over the traditional airlines such as internet paperless booking, minimum cabin crew with lower wage scales, high utilization of airports, low turnaround time, one class of seating to fit more seats, low luggage, and customers paying for refreshments.
6. They utilize a business model with an emphasis on low fares, reducing overheads, and cost cuts by using secondary airports with cheaper landing charges.
7. With a reduction in costs, low-cost airlines are even able to operate a wider point to point journeys than the traditional airlines, helping them to earn higher profit margins.
8. Consequently, the low-cost carriers were able to capture a higher market share in the aviation industry, and traditional airlines set up their own low-cost subsidiaries or lower their prices.
9. The following table will help us understand the increasing worldwide market share of low-cost airlines from 2007-to 2019
10. According to Statista, In the United States, the Low-cost carriers hold above 30 percent of the domestic market with Southwest ranked second among the leading airline in the U.S., with a market share of 17.6 in 2019, just behind American Airlines.
11. Few examples of the biggest low-cost carriers in the United States is Southwest Airline with a market capitalization of $14.1 billion (May 2020) and the biggest carrier in terms of originating domestic passengers boarded. JetBlue Airways Corp. known for the most legroom in coach class, free TV, and broadband internet service on the flight has a market capitalization of $2.2 billion (May 2020).
12. Another example is Allegiant Travel, which runs Allegiant Air and is known for connecting small and mid-sized, has a market capitalization of $1.3 billion (May 2020)
Other Examples
1. Wal-Mart Stores
Offers products at attractive cheaper prices than its competitors because of its large scale purchasing power and efficient supply chain.
They sell a wide range of products and its focus is always on selling products at the lowest prices in the market. From grocery to entertainment, Walmart provides a variety of products.
They consistently engage with their customers with discounts and shopping convenience. Its net revenue grew to $514.4 billion in 2019 and the brand employs millions of workers.
2. McDonald Restaurant
The brand’s cost leadership strategy allows them to keep production cost low, hire few managers, recruit and train fresh labor and offer affordable prices to its customers.
Their operational excellence helps to maximize the efficiency of the product development process and create a competitive advantage.
In 2019, the company generated close to $40.5 billion, about $19 billion more than its closest rival Starbucks in the fast-food industry.
3. Ikea
It operates roughly 422 stores in more than 50 markets, with nearly 70 percent of stores located in Europe.
Its sales are estimated to be $46.2 Billion, with a business model focused on lowering prices by sourcing from low-wage countries and offering a basic level of service.
Ikea reduces its cost of operations further by allowing customers to assemble their furniture and take their delivery.
Disadvantages of Cost Leadership
1. Financial Cuts
The reduced costs can affect critical areas of the business for examples ‘customer service’. Most customers want to feel valued not just when they buy from a business but also when they require after-sales service.
Companies may also reduce employee benefits such as insurance, training, and incentives to reduce operational costs, which can affect employee confidence and eventually their productivity.
2. Lack of Innovation
Many companies employing the cost leadership strategy might find the cost related to the research and development team undesirable.
This results in a reduction of funds which ultimately results in the lack of innovative new products, leading the management to promote the same products.
Consequently, the company might end up losing its customers and market share to businesses with innovative products.
3. Applicability to Other Products
The cost leadership strategy cannot be applied to every industry, particularly premium products where customers pay the premium because of brand recognition and high quality.
It might lead to adverse effects, as the brand loses its exclusive tag and is no longer desired by its target customers
4. Consumer Feedback
Executives tend to ignore the market shifts in the products and the change in consumer preferences when they only prioritize low prices.
Consumers are ever-changing, and it is the responsibility of a company to keep up with the changes by constantly engaging with their customers through surveys, feedback, discussions, etc. This requires a certain amount of capital to be set aside for its operations.
5. Increase in Competition
Several competitors might enter the market, applying the same techniques of operational efficiency and cost cuts to sell the same products and benefit from the higher profit margins.
Consequently, leading to a crowded market and a drop in market share.
6. Capital Availability
Businesses employing this strategy should be able to achieve a large volume of sales while applying operational scaling, before they run out of capital.
This can lead to depletion of capital reserves as there is not enough cash flowing into the business. The company might also be forced to take up additional debt just to be operational.
In the worst scenario, such a situation can cause the business to file for bankruptcy.
Summary
Cost Leadership is a strategy to reduce the cost of operation and produce the lowest priced products or services, to outdo the closest competitors and gain market share.
Examples include home renovation companies specializing in one aspect such as kitchen or bathroom remodeling who can save on raw material cost and work with wholesale distributors to achieve the best pricing on their packages and flat fee brokers which offers fixed commission fees and included services to clients.
Cost leadership focuses on establishing a competitive advantage by lowering the cost of operation in the industry. While price leadership means prioritizing the lowest price to gain market share, even at the cost of less profits.
Benefits include an increase in market size, a higher chance of survival during downturns, more capital available for upgrades, and higher profit margins.
Few examples, include Wal-Mart Stores, McDonald’s Restaurant, and Ikea
Disadvantages of the strategy include Financial cuts to critical areas like customer service, lack of innovation, lack of applicability to premium products, change in preferences of the consumer, increased competition, and crunch in capital availability.
FAQs
1. What is a cost leadership strategy?
The cost leadership strategy is a business model that focuses on reducing the cost of production and offering the lowest priced products to outperform competitors and gain market share.
2. What is the difference between cost leadership and price leadership?
Cost leadership is when a business prioritizes reducing the cost of production to offer the lowest priced products. Price leadership is when a business offers the lowest price as its main selling point.
3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using a cost leadership strategy?
The advantages of the cost leadership strategy include an increase in market size, a higher chance of survival during downturns, more capital available for upgrades, and higher profit margins. The disadvantages of the strategy include financial cuts to critical areas like customer service, lack of innovation, lack of applicability to premium products, change in preferences of the consumer, increased competition, and a crunch in capital availability.
4. What are the characteristics of a cost leadership strategy?
The characteristics of a cost leadership strategy include reducing the cost of operation, producing the lowest priced products, and outperforming competitors.
5. Why is cost leadership strategy important?
The cost leadership strategy is important because it allows businesses to produce products at a lower cost and offer them at a lower price than competitors, which gives them a competitive advantage.
Some of the advantages of cost leadership include greater efficiency, gaining more customers, and increased competitiveness. However, some of the cost leadership disadvantages include lack of research, reduction of product creation, and innovation.
Perhaps the most famous cost leader is Walmart, which has used a cost leadership strategy to become the largest company in the world. The firm's advertising slogans such as “Always Low Prices” and “Save Money.Live Better” communicate Walmart's emphasis on price slashing to potential customers.
In some settings, the need for high sales volume is a critical disadvantage of a cost-leadership strategy. Highly fragmented markets and markets that involve a lot of brand loyalty may not offer much of an opportunity to attract a large segment of customers.
The advantages of the cost leadership strategy include an increase in market size, a higher chance of survival during downturns, more capital available for upgrades, and higher profit margins.
The risks of a cost leadership strategy include: becoming "stuck in the middle." production and distribution processes becoming obsolete. the ability of competing firms to provide similar features in a product.
Perhaps the most famous cost leader is Walmart, which has used a cost-leadership strategy to become the largest company in the world. The firm's advertising slogans such as “Always Low Prices” and “Save Money. Live Better” communicate Walmart's emphasis on price slashing to potential customers.
Coca-cola effectively uses a low pricing strategy a lot to penetrate new markets that are very price-conscious. They set the prices around the same level as the competitors to enable Coca-cola to be distinct but affordable. They do this to beat the competition on price and raise the awareness of the Coca-Cola brand.
IKEA keeps production costs low by signing long-term contracts with its suppliers. The result is that IKEA is able to keep its costs low consistently, instead of constantly scrambling to find the lowest cost supplier.
Question: What is one potential disadvantage of a cost leadership strategy created by technology? If the technology is not owned by the firm, the advantage often instead goes to the owner of the technology. It can only be used by large companies.
A cost-leadership competitive strategy helps reduce the threat of new entrants by creating cost-based barriers to entry such as economies of scale and cost advantages independent of scale. Threat of Rivalry. Firms with a low-cost position reduce the threat of rivalry.
However, several challenges associated with strategic leadership can limit success. These include insufficient resources, resistance to change, inadequate communication, lack of alignment among stakeholders, and difficulty staying focused in the long term.
Perhaps the biggest pitfall of a low-cost provider strategy is getting carried away with overly aggressive price cutting and ending up with lower, rather than higher, profitability.
It allows manufacturers to reduce costs and set attractive prices, contributing to attracting new customers, increasing customer base, and customer retention.
The main benefit of cost focus is that customers feel that they are getting a bargain. As long as quality hasn't been skimped to save the bottom line, customers will be attracted by a good value for money product or service. A cost-focus strategy is a low-cost, narrowly focused market strategy.
The benefits of implementing strategic cost management include reducing costs stickiness, increasing corporate sustainability, and creating a competitive advantage.
Introduction: My name is Pres. Lawanda Wiegand, I am a inquisitive, helpful, glamorous, cheerful, open, clever, innocent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.
We notice you're using an ad blocker
Without advertising income, we can't keep making this site awesome for you.
